I would say Yes and NO to that. yes, because he has surpassed his predecessors in damaging the world. No, beacuse his actions are not worthy of being talked with any amount of reasoning and well intention. I read yet another editorial and couldnt agree with the author any more about the nature of the prsident of United States of America.
His intentions, by far, are but a cloud of contradictions. He had remained seemingly unaffected when 9/11 happened. The best he could muster to do was to launch a war against a soveriegn nation and bring its President to gallows with the excuse that he was a threat to the world. The judge appointed by Lord Almighty himself.
Thousands of americans and Iraqis could not move him or his decision. Nor could the victims of Katrina stimulate compassion in him, if its to be judged by delayed and not-so-sympathetic adress after the catastrophe. The number of hard core issues solved by him in a tenure of 8 years are not even worthy of being counted on fingers.
Yes to him for being an ageis for the oil majors, and hardly bothering to notice the incresing threat to environment. Yes to him, for bringing terrorism to a stage where it has now become a fashion. Yes to him, for ruining a nation and not even having his conscience challenged. Yes to him, for telling lies in public and supporting his whimsical ideas by going back on his own word.
And finally, NO to him for being the person most responsible for the chaos in a rapidly degenrating world.
No comments:
Post a Comment